Just How Healthy was Jesus?Ĭonsider Jesus, a first century peasant village artisan. Is that which is presented on the Shroud of Turin realistic? Does it correspond with the real historical situation and health conditions of first century Galilean peasants like the historical Jesus? How does the Shroud stack up to the ample skeletal evidence we have from first century Syro-Palestine? Let’s explore this. Pope Francis maintains this position and language. Still, Clement VII declared the Shroud to be a man-made icon, and that churches could still display it. The pope had been informed by the Bishop of Troyes that an artist had confessed to having forged it. Roughly thirty years later, Pope Clement VII declared the Shroud was not the actual burial cloth of Christ. The Shroud first appears on the historical record in the middle of 14 th century France. The impression in the cloth shows a man, somewhere between 5’10” and 6’2,” with long hair (see 1 Corinthians 11:14). The figure is strong, implying good nutrition and sound health. Looking at the Shroud, many imagine that we have a scientific proof of what Jesus looked like.Ĭonsidering health again (and putting aside its signs of wounds and trauma), what does the human image imprinted on the Shroud convey? We see a long-limbed, very robust and healthy figure, quite handsome to Western standards. The resulting images are purported to be the closest we can to come to a photograph of him. Believed far and wide by many Christians to be the genuine burial cloth of Jesus, this fourteen foot long linen cloth is scrutinized and used as a template for artistic depictions of Jesus. The Shroud of Turin, perhaps the most famous of all things claimed to be relics, is once again making the news rounds.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |